Bibliography

=Bibliography=

Beichner, R.J. (1990). The effect of simultaneous motion presentation and graph generation in a kinematics lab. //Journal of Reserch in Science Teaching, 27//(8), 803-815.

Bookman, J. (2006). Negotiating roles and meaning while learning mathematics in interactive technology-rich environments. //The Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6//(2), 41-65.

Brasell, H. (1987). The effect of real-time laboratory graphing on learning graphic representations of distance and velocity. //Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24//(4), 385-395.

Clement, John, Lochhead, Jack, & Soloway, Elliot (1979). //Translation between symbol systems: Isolating a common difficulty in solving algebra word problems// (COINS Tech. Rep. No. 79-19). Amherst: University of Massachusetts, Department of Computer and Information Sciences.

Esty, W.W., & Teppo, A.R. (1996). Algebraic thinking, language, and word problems. In P.C. Elliott & M.J. Kenney (Ed.), //Communication in mathematics, K-12 and beyond// (pp.40-44). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathmatics.

Fey, J. T. (1989). School algebra for the year 2000. In C. Kieran & S. Wagner (Eds.), //Research Issues in the Learning and Teaching of Algebra// (pp. 199-213). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Goldenberg, P. E. (2003). Algebra and Computer algebra. In J. T. Fey, A. Cuoco, C. Kieran, L. McMullin, & R. M. Zbiek (Eds.), //Computer Algebra Systems in Secondary School Mathematics Education// (pp. 9-30). Reston, VA: NCTM  Graham, A. T., & Thomas, M. O. J. (2000). Building a versatile understanding of algebraic variables with a graphic calculator. //Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41//(3), 265-282.

Hale, P.L. (2000). Connecting research to teaching: Kinematics and graphs: Students' difficulties and CBLs. //Mathematics Teacher, 93 //(5), 414-417

Heid, M. K. (2003). Theories for thinking about the use of CAS in teaching and learning mathematics. In J. T. Fey, A. Cuoco, C. Kieran, L. McMullin, & R. M. Zbiek (Eds.), //Computer Algebra Systems in Secondary School Mathematics Education// (pp. 9-30). Reston, VA: NCTM.

Herscovics, N. (1989). Cognitive obstacles encountered in the learning of algebra. In C. Kieran & S. Wagner (Eds.), //Research Issues in the Learning and Teaching of Algebra// (pp. 60-86). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Kaput J. J. (1987). Towards a theory of symbol use in mathematics. In C. Janiver (Ed.), //Problems of Representations in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics// (pp. 159-195). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Kaput, J. J. (1989). Linking representations in the symbol system of algebra. In C. Kieran & S. Wagner (Eds.), //Research Issues in the Learning and Teaching of Algebra// (pp. 167-194). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Kaput, J. J. (2000). Transforming Algebra from an Engine of Inequity to an Engine of Mathematical Power by "Algebrafying" the K-12 Curriculum (Report No. SE 063 389) Dartmouth, MA: National Center for Improving Student Learning and Achievement in Mathematics and Science. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 441664 )

Kaput, J. J. (2008). What is algebra? What is algebraic reasoning? In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher, & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), //Algebra in the early grades// (pp. 5-17). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group.

Kaput, J. J., Blanton, M. L., & Moreno, L. (2008). Algebra from a symbolization point of view. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher, & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), //Algebra in the early grades// (pp. 19-55). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group.

Kieran, C. (1989). The early learning of algebra: A structural perspective. In C. Kieran & S. Wagner (Eds.), //Research Issues in the Learning and Teaching of Algebra// (pp. 33-56). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Kutzler, B. (2003). CAS as pedagogical tools for teaching and learning mathematics. In J. T. Fey, A. Cuoco, C. Kieran, L. McMullin, & R. M. Zbiek (Eds.), //Computer Algebra Systems in Secondary School Mathematics Education// (pp. 53-71). Reston, VA: NCTM

Leitzel, J. R. (1989). Critical considerations for the future of algebra instruction. In C. Kieran & S. Wagner (Eds.), //Research Issues in the Learning and Teaching of Algebra// (pp. 25-32). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Lesh, R., Behr, M., & Post, T. (1987). Rational number relations and proportions. In C. Janiver (Ed.), //Problems of Representations in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics// (pp. 41-58). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Manouchehri, A. & Lapp, D.A. (2003). Unveiling Student Understanding: The Role of Questioning in Instruction, //Mathematics Teacher//, //96//(//8//), 562-566.

McCoy, L.P. (1989). Use of variables: Algebra-computer-english translation. //International Association for Computing in Education Conference//. San Francisco, CA.  McCoy, L.P., Baker, T.H., & Little, L.S. (1996). Using multiple representations to communicate: An algebra challenge. In P.C. Elliott & M.J. Kenney (Ed.), //Communication in mathematics, K-12 and beyond// (pp.40-44). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathmatics.

McDermott, L.C., Rosenquist, M.L., & van Zee, E.H. (1986). Student difficulties in connecting graphs and physics:Examples from kinematics. //Am. J. Phys, 55//(6), 503-513.

Pirie, S., & Kieren, T. (1994). Growth in mathematical understanding: How can we characterize it and how can we represent it?. //Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26 //(2/3), 165-190.  Schliemann, A.D., Carraher, D.W., & Brizuela, B.M. (2007). //Bringing out the algebraic character of arithmetic: From children’s ideas to classroom practice.// Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Sfard, A. (1995).The development of algebra: Confronting historical and psychological perspectives.//Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 14//(1), 15-39.

Stacey, K. (2005). Accessing results from research on technology in mathematics education. //Australian Senior Mathematics Journal, 19//(1), 8-15.

Tall, D., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity. //Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12//(2), 151-169.  Tall, D. (1989). Different cognitive obstacles in a technological paradigm. In C. Kieran & S. Wagner (Eds.), //Research Issues in the Learning and Teaching of Algebra// (pp. 87-92). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Wagner, S. (1983). What are these things called variables?. //Mathematics Teacher, 76 //(7), 474-479.

Warren, E. A., Cooper, T. J., & Lamb J. T. (2006). Investigating functional thinking in the elementary classroom: Foundations of early algebraic reasoning. //The Journal of Mathematical Behavior //, //25 //(3), 208-223.

Zbiek, R. M. (1998). Prospective teachers’ use of computing tools to develop and validate functions as mathematical models. //Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29 //(2), 184-201.